Saints Row Wiki


Spoilers and references

452 August 18, 2013 User blog:452

Again: Spoilers are fine, but must be properly referenced, and located in the appropriate section of relevant articles.

The events of missions should first be added to mission articles. Feel free to create them if they do not exist.

Do not add mission events to character articles if the mission article does not exist, and do not add the entire walkthrough of the mission to a character article in lieu of creating the mission article itself.

Here's a reminder summary of the Saints Row Wiki's policies regarding information about upcoming games, spoilers, and speculation.

This is a follow up to User_blog:452/Upcoming_games


Saying "No Spoilers" on a site which claims to be "The most comprehensive Saints Row information archive" would be ridiculous.

"Spoilers alerts" have no place here. This wiki should contains all information, therefore it should be assumed that it contains spoilers.

The only policy we have regarding spoilers is that spoilers only be posted in relevant places.

Adding info about Johnny Gat's death to the Forklift article is wrong, but there's no problem with that information being added to any articles directly related to it, such as the Johnny Gat and I'm Free - Free Falling.
Essentially, someone looking for information about Saints Row should be able to safely browse the site without learning about the events of Saints Row 2.
Those people should be able to read the Saints Row sections of the Johnny Gat and never learn his fate. If they choose to read the Saints Row: The Third article, that is their own choice.

(Fun fact: This policy is largely in response to places like Lostpedia, who think it's fine to mention the events of later episodes in articles.)


Speculation is pointless. Plain and simple. There's plenty actual information which still needs to be added to this wiki, so why add maybes? It's not going to change anything, and you won't get any points for guessing correctly.

Rumours are equally pointless most of the time. If a developer hints about something on twitter, then simply state that he said it on twitter (with a link), don't speculate about what it may or may not mean. (After it's known, that's a different matter)

If something is unknown, such as "Is it unknown whether Dex appears in Saints Row IV", you do not need to add it to an article. The fact that Dex isn't mentioned in the Saints Row IV article is good enough.
In some cases, such as the Kia article, the correct way to state "her fate is unknown" is to say that "what happened to Kia at the end of Three Way was not shown, and she did not appear in the following mission". Speculating that he may or may not have died is not necessary.


After a game is released, anyone can play it and verify random facts, so citations aren't needed for many things. Right now, the only source of information is websites, trailers and images. Therefore any, and all, information added about Saints Row IV should be accompanied with a link to the source of the information, and an image if the source of information is an image or video.

Simply saying "X was shown in an image/video" is not good enough.
Linking to the source allows anyone on the wiki to verify the information, and ensure it isn't something that someone has made up.

Due to a history of false information being added, and the ease at which someone can just add false information to the wiki, anything regarding Saints Row IV which does not have a reference will be immediately removed.

Most times when people are adding information, they have the source of the information open in another tab, so link to it.
Very specifically:
  • The sentence "X is seen in the Y trailer" should be accompanied with a screenshot of the Y trailer, clearly showing X".
  • The sentence "LameGameReporter said that blah blah blah" should be accompanied with a link to the where they said that.
We all get things wrong sometimes. Yesterday, I added that the Atlasbreaker appeared in the teaser video, but when I went to make a screenshot to upload, I realised that it wasn't actually the Atlasbreaker, it was a new monster truck. This is why screenshots should always be added as proof.

Official sources

Use the original, official, sources of information.

If your mother tells you she heard a rumour that LameGameReporter posted how they heard from a random guy at Comic Con that there was an official announcement, do not credit the your mother for telling you. Find the original announcement.

If there is a Press Release, link to the official Press Release, or at the very least a verbatim quote of the offical Press Release, not some site which has cut it up. If LameGameReporter discusses a video they've rehosted and stuck their logo on, find the original source of the video. The same goes with images. Do not upload images with watermarks. Use Google Image Search to find a clean alternative.

Game news sites which post news as if it is exclusive they got direct from the developers are scum sucking plagiarists.
If you use a Game news site which does not cite the source of their information, you should find a better site.
Game news sites which add their own logo to promotional images are committing copyright infringement - they don't own the images, and have no right to slap their logo on it.


Use descriptive filenames. To put it in other words: describe the picture in the filename.

To use an actual example added today:

A file named "1.png" was uploaded, and added to an article with the caption: "The Protagonist in Saints Row IV"
A bunch better filename would be "The Protagonist in Saints Row IV.png"
Obviously there may be multiple files uploaded with that subject, so "The Protagonist in Saints Row IV 12345.png" is quite acceptable, but filenames should always at the very least contain the name of the article they are for, if not a full description of the picture.

Before Saints Row: The Third was released, we had a much more relaxed policy. All we did was tag new information with {{fact}}, and hoped that someone would add the source later.

That did not work. There are still many pre-release facts about SRTT which do not have sources. Every now and then, I notice something false that added pre-release that no-one ever removed.

This time, let's make sure that doesn't happen.

Additionally, we're always looking for new admins, I'd definitely like to add at least two before August. Anyone who make things easier for existing admins by adding references, removing unsourced facts and speculation, and using descriptive filenames will be considered - there's no application process, just be a great contributor and I will notice. :)

And when new information is released, anyone is welcome to make a blog post and add it to Category:Game News.

Also on Fandom

Random Wiki