This is a User talk page. See Saints Row Wiki:Discussions for discussion policies.
- Only post here regarding edits made by 452, or GlitchBot, or issues which require an admin.
- Keep conversations on the same page. Do not split discussions. If a discussion exists, continue it there.
- Messages left here which belong elsewhere may be deleted without a response.
- Replies posted here instead of on the original page may be deleted without a response.
Where should I post...
Due to size, existing conversations are split by year
If you have something to add to those discussions, reply on those pages.
I understand why you removed my edition on store hacking but I think it's a bit over the top. In Sleeping Dogs, the hero dates many girls but the author doesn't want to depict sex in any form, so he uses everything at his disposal to make the audience understand that the hero had sex with the girls. The author does it without saying it, without showing it; just by implying it, so the "dumb guy" "don't get it" and the rest of the audience understand what happens "off screen". That's called "implicit" (opposed to explicit / explanation). It is an elaborate way to tells stuff but it can't be proof with any "explicit reference". This is where the factual policy fells short. It's an encyclopedy about a video game, not about a software. As we can't reference implicit, then we are screw.
Why would the first quest of the protagonist would be "Breaking The Law" if it was not to underline the very fact that, from now on (after the real world) he's breaking the law?
Why "store hacking" would be the first mission of "Breaking The Law" if it was not to underline the very fact that, from now on, he's hacker who use gateway to access the simulation?
So yeah, I defenitly get your point, we can't proove that the usage of hacking back doors and gateways are corelated to the fact that the shop are locked. Steve jarros should have tells it with words and sounds and pictures, but, he didn't. BigDarsh, 2017-02-27T07:58:44Z
- This wiki is based upon facts.
- The fact is that the narrative of the game does not address the stores becoming locked.
- During The Fundamentals, using Friendly Fire is an objective - and the store is not locked.
- Immediately after The Real World, the first mission is about hacking stores - at this point there is no reason for the player to even know that all stores had become locked.
- Kinzie specifically says "I know hacking stores seems trivial, but it's a good place for us to begin", without any mention of the fact that the stores were suddenly locked in the first place.
- Therefore, is it factual, and well worth mentioning, that stores become locked without explanation.
- 452, 2017-02-27T08:07:49Z
- I don't argue the factual policy and I even think it's the best way to establish an encyclopedia. My point is, there are tons of informations unavaible in the video game (from an experience point of view) on that wiki, such as the spawn rate of vehicle. Where did the source come from? It comes from hacking the video game. There are no fact in the video game (from an experience point of view) that can establish the spawn rate of a vehicle.
- Pretty much every fact comes from hacking a software and not experiencing a video game. So I won't argue with this anymore. It's just weird that this encyclopedia provide info unavaible in the video game (only on the game file), but don't want to provide information that are avaible in the video game (from an experience pov). Is this wiki is about video game users providing info about the video game they play or about hacker that spend time to explore data files? (Which is illegal by the way, but this is not where I am getting at)
- BigDarsh, 2017-02-27T16:10:52Z
- "Where did the source come from? It comes from hacking the video game. There are no fact in the video game that can establish the spawn rate of a vehicle."
- If it's on the disc, then it's part of the game. The vehicle speeds are provably part of the game, even if you can't determine them while in the game, they are still a provable fact.
- I've explained this before, but it's not in a very easy-to-find place, so I'll make a new post about this in the near future. Including information from the data files has been a vital part of this wiki for over 6 years, and nobody has ever disputed including information obtained from the game data files before, so there has never been a cause for me to explicitly mention it.
- But for the record, one of the policy pages has already said for some time that
"about the actual game" means
- "in the game" - anything visible in the game is allowed.
- "on the disc" - cut and disabled content is allowed.
- "available as DLC" - downloadable content is allowed.
- "from the developers" - trivia from developers is allowed.
- "Pretty much every fact comes from hacking a software and not experiencing a video game."
- That is not true. While obviously all exact numbers come from extracting the information from the data files, all quotes and mission details are verifiable in the game.
- If this wiki were based solely upon "experiencing a video game", then it would rely on people's memories.
- Extracting information ensures accuracy, and has uncovered countless times when people writing things down from memory has been wrong.
- "It's just weird that this encyclopedia provide info unavaible in the video game (only on the game file), but don't want to provide information that are avaible in the video game (from an experience pov)."
- The information is not available "from an experience pov". You are just making things to fill the gaps, which is subjective speculation, not fact.
- I've explained very clearly what occurs in the game "from an experience pov". What you attempted to add was an explanation that you just made up, which does not reflect the experience in the game.
- "Is this wiki is about video game users providing info about the video game they play or about hacker that spend time to explore data files?"
- That is a False dilemma. It is not an either/or situation.
- This wiki contains facts about a video game. Those facts can come from anywhere, including playing the game, or obtaining information from the data files, or statements from the developers.
- This wiki is not about video game users opinions.
- "(Which is illegal by the way)"
- You have just accused me of a crime, and I was about to block you, but it turns out that while "legal threats" are specified in the Civility policy, "accusing someone of breaking the law", technically isn't.
- I didn't accused you of anything. I say that lots of data come from hacking the software, I didn't say that you hacked anything. And that's a fact so stop accusing me, it's bullshit. "It's fallacy, it's an opinion totally subjective you made up because you didn't pay attention to the fact, and you should stick to the fact before threatening me or anyone else." . End of story. I understand your point, just didn't get mine.
- Who do you think added the majority of extracted information if not me? Even if you meant someone else, you were still accusing an editor of this wiki of breaking the law, so just replace the word "me" with "an editor of this wiki", and it's the same offence.
- "I will stop providing info that I can't verify"
- Nobody should ever add any information they cannot verify. Unverified information is not much better than speculation.
- Hacking tools are not necessary to verify in-game information. Simply playing the game is sufficient to conclude that the stores becoming locked is unexplained. Making up your own explanation is fan-fiction.
- 452, 2017-02-28T00:36:26Z
Is it important to point out that the music used (such as the Hungarian Rhapsody #2 in SR3) is the shorter version of the real thing? X~Calibur95, 2017-05-14T12:06:49Z
- I wouldn't call it "important", but it is notable enough that it should be mentioned. :)
- I've noticed in several cases, classical songs only contain certain movements.
- The wikipedia page for Hungarian Rhapsody No. 2, notes that there are 2 distinct sections, can you confirm that it's one of those sections which is included in the game?
- 452, 2017-05-14T12:15:41Z
- It turns out that the Hungarian Rhapsody No. 2 in SR3 includes both sections, the Lassan (slow 1st half) & Friska (more upbeat 2nd half). The Lassan section was shortened such that intro for that was not repeated, but I'm not sure how much it is cut off by since it has been a while since I played the game. A fun fact for you is that I was the one who added that information on that Wikipedia article many years ago.
- X~Calibur95, 2017-05-14T12:30:22Z
- Well it's good to have an expert on the subject. :)
- So basically, just the intro is shortened?
- I notice that the Wikipedia article has an extensive "In popular culture" section, do you know if this same shortened version is used in any other cases?
- 452, 2017-05-14T12:36:00Z
- Yep, just the intro. As for the other references to popular culture, SR3 is so far the only version I have heard of.
- X~Calibur95, 2017-05-14T12:43:03Z
Hello 452, I have some images of characters from Saints Row Undercover that I got from my psp emulator but now the wiki won't let me upload them to the Saints Row Undercover gallery. 3rd5aints4life, 2017-07-29T02:28:01Z
- What do you mean "Won't let you"?
- Is there an error message?
- Please take a screenshot of the screen and upload it somewhere else and link it.
- 452, 2017-07-29T03:12:13Z
- Here I uploaded the error the page gives me on http://saintsrowfanfiction.wikia.com/wiki/File:Upload_error.PNG
- 3rd5aints4life, 2017-07-29T03:25:43Z
- Thanks for confirming that the error message is displaying correctly.
- 452, 2017-07-29T04:16:49Z
- So what do I do to fix the error?
- 3rd5aints4life, 2017-07-29T04:20:13Z
- Read the error message.
- 452, 2017-07-29T04:38:02Z
Dude this is 3rd5aints4life and thats the time where I Live. Its currently around 11:50 pm where i live. Also you didnt warn me that i was doing things incorrectly before you banned and didn't even give me a change to correct them. 2600:1:9197:C8A9:6DAD:3CB5:21E1:F3D5, 2017-08-02T03:56:34Z
- 1. The time where you live is irrelevant, but I'm pretty sure there's nowhere on earth where it's 11:50PM on the 2nd of August.
- Your claim that - at 03:56 - it's "around 11:50 pm" where you live is odd, because at 03:25 you posted a comment claiming to be from "10:24". Somehow, 1 hour and 26 minutes passed for you in the same amount of time that 31 minutes passed on the wiki.
- You sign your posts with ~~~~, just like it says on the edit page. The edit page instructions were your first warning, me editing your previous timestamps was your second warning.
- 2. You have just admitted to evading a ban.
- 452, 2017-08-02T04:18:48Z (last edited: 452, 2017-08-02T04:36:17Z)
Question about the edit on my wallEdit
Just curious as to this edit in specific, what is the purpose of creating the blank page? Is it because my archived page was deleted and it had my old username or?
- re-creating blank talk page because redirect exists.
- 452, 2017-08-07T22:20:51Z (last edited: 452, 2017-08-07T22:21:29Z)
- Yeah I read that bit, but what was the redirect for originally?
- Six18, 2017-08-07T22:27:10Z
- 452, 2017-08-07T22:29:12Z (last edited: 452, 2017-08-07T22:29:30Z)
- Thank you.
- Six18, 2017-08-07T22:40:33Z
Hey 452, it's me, Zeus.
I know I've done this Wikia wrong on some level, and some other wikis too. Can't we just set this straight though? You kept blocking me every month and stuff, on and on and on, until I finally thought it was over. Then I came into chat, looking for a serious talk, and I come back a few hours later, "You are missing permissions." C'mon man, I never tried to evade a block, nor grief this wiki. Can't we talk this out?
It's currently 10:17AM October 26th
Thanks for reading this. :D
(unsigned: 2804:214:8100:165A:E604:AB35:2E84:D80C 12:18, October 26, 2017)
(Why isn't this showing up? :p) (unsigned: 2804:214:8100:165A:E604:AB35:2E84:D80C 12:19, October 26, 2017)
(Sorry for sending it twice, laggy internet) (unsigned: 2804:214:8100:165A:E604:AB35:2E84:D80C 12:23, October 26, 2017)
- Are you also ZeusGamer101/CodeFireblaze? -452 13:22, October 26, 2017 (UTC)
- Not sure. My brother had a wiki account too at some time on the same IP. But I am 99.9% certain I was ZeusGamer101. Time flies, don't it (unsigned: 2804:214:82C5:65ED:A325:9A10:4CB7:91CB - 2017-10-26 21:48:49)
- As has already been pointed out to you, the Saints Row Wiki is anti-discrimination.
- Your discriminatory insults mean that you are not welcome on this wiki.
- By choosing to be a small-minded bigot, you have chosen to not be a part of this wiki.
- The block duration is a formality: you are not welcome here, and you will be re-blocked any time you try to edit here.
- -452 00:01, October 27, 2017 (UTC)
Radio Station QuotesEdit
452, Add the quotes of Two Big Kish's Introductions of "Boom Bye Yeah" on the 95.4 KRhyme FM page. And Add the quotes of Two Big Ben's Introductions of "What I Got" and "My Adidas" on the 107.77 The Mix FM page.--Aja22 (talk) 18:37, January 3, 2018 (UTC)
- I do not take orders. -452 19:08, May 11, 2018 (UTC)
sr2 dlc moddingEdit
I was wondering if you had any more progress on modding the sr2 dlc files for pc. If you're not so bothered anymore can I perhaps carry on the research then? If yes then I would appreciate if you gave me the exported dlc files or could give me contact with the person that can.
(unsigned: Bradsywadsy - 2018-03-29 22:02:40)
- I don't know who you are, or what "more" progress you're referring to, as I don't recall ever attempting to make any progress on "modding the sr2 dlc files for pc".
- If I have posted anything about that anywhere in the past, then you should be commenting there instead of on my talk page.
- -452 23:40, March 29, 2018 (UTC)
Hey 452 I was wondering if u still had the save file that had the Bulldog in Saints Row 1
And I wanted to know if u could make a save for Saints row 1 with the pimp slap in single player?
- That's not a Bulldog. If it was a Bulldog, it would say Bulldog in the filename (it doesn't) and the image would be in the Bulldog article (it isn't). -452 16:14, April 23, 2018 (UTC)
- I could make a save with the Pimp Slap in single player, but given that this question is your only edit to the wiki in 4 years, I'm not going to do that until you contribute more to the wiki. -452 23:48, June 2, 2018 (UTC)
In regards to backwards compat revision, how about straight from the Saints Row twitter? Major Nelson is a Director of Programming for the Microsoft gaming network Xbox Live and one of the most trusted sources for XBOX info there is. He announces all the backwards compat games. Everyone knows how unreliable the official XBOX list is. People use Major Nelson's own list is updated more often and much quicker.
(unsigned: Dyson14444 - 2018-06-02 23:12:36)
- New sections require a heading, and as it says at the top of the page: all edits must be signed with ~~~~.
- How about the Microsoft store page? https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/p/saints-row/brkb6h11mbds (For the record, I checked there on the 28th, but it wasn't up yet.)
- "Everyone knows how unreliable the official XBOX list is."
- I don't care what "Everyone" thinks is "unreliable": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum
- This Saints Row twitter post links to the official backwards compatibility list, so they certainly expected it to be updated.
- If the official Xbox list is unreliable, then Microsoft really should get their shit together. If the very first place the information was made available was twitter, then that's a pretty poor state of affairs.
- That majornelson.com page links to the Xbox 360 store pages instead of the Xbox One store pages, so it looks like that's pretty unreliable too.
- -452 23:48, June 2, 2018 (UTC)